The High-Profile Legal Battle Unfolds
In a dramatic twist to an ongoing political saga, the Federal Government has listed Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello as witnesses in its case against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central). The case, filed by the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), alleges perjury and forgery against the senator.
This development has sent shockwaves through Nigeria’s political circles, given the high-profile nature of those involved. Here’s what we know so far.
Background: Why is Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Being Prosecuted?
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, a vocal critic of the former Kogi State government, has been locked in a long-standing political and legal battle with Yahaya Bello’s administration. The current case stems from allegations that she lied under oath regarding her educational qualifications and NYSC records during her election petition proceedings.
The Federal Government’s charges include:
- False declaration of educational credentials
- Forgery of documents
- Perjury (lying under oath)
If convicted, the senator could face jail time and possible disqualification from office.
Why Are Akpabio and Yahaya Bello Being Called as Witnesses?
The inclusion of Senate President Akpabio and ex-Governor Bello as prosecution witnesses suggests that the Federal Government believes their testimonies could strengthen its case.
Possible Reasons:
- Yahaya Bello’s Role – As Kogi’s former governor, he may have access to official records or information relevant to the case.
- Akpabio’s Involvement – The Senate President may have been privy to documents or statements made during Senate screenings or legal proceedings.
Political analysts suggest that this could also be a proxy war between political factions, given Akpoti-Uduaghan’s history of clashing with the APC-led state government.
Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Defense
The senator has denied all allegations, calling the case a “politically motivated witch-hunt.” Her legal team argues:
- The charges are an attempt to silence her criticism of the previous Kogi government.
- Her academic records are genuine and verifiable.
- The timing of the case (after her electoral victory) suggests foul play.
In a recent statement, she said:
“This is nothing but intimidation. I have all my certificates intact, and no amount of persecution will stop me from representing my people.”
Political Implications
This case has far-reaching consequences:
✔ For Natasha – A conviction could end her Senate career.
✔ For Akpabio & Bello – Their testimonies could strain political alliances, especially if perceived as targeting an opposition figure.
✔ For Kogi Politics – The case may deepen divisions between APC and PDP factions in the state.
What Happens Next?
- The case is expected to proceed in the Federal High Court.
- Akpabio and Bello will likely be summoned to testify under oath.
- If Natasha is acquitted, she could file a countersuit for malicious prosecution.
Final Thoughts
This legal battle goes beyond just Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan—it’s a test of Nigeria’s judicial independence and political tolerance. Will the case be decided on merit, or is it another example of Nigeria’s “use of state machinery against opponents”?
What do you think?
- Is this a genuine case of perjury, or political persecution?
- Should high-profile figures like Akpabio and Bello testify publicly?
Drop your comments below!
